First round review by topic editor

Author: uoph

August undefined, 2024

WebThe First Read-Through. Following the invitation to review, when you'll have received the article abstract, you should already understand the aims, key data and conclusions of the manuscript. If you don't, make a note … WebIt is rare for manuscripts to be recommended “as is” in the first round of review. If the Editor does not agree with the AE’s recommendation, the Editor may return the …

How many revisions does it take to produce a top academic article?

WebSep 18, 2015 · The first round of revision was very fast; it took less than 10 days. One of two referees suggested a minor revision while the other asked for a moderate amount of … WebRevise and Resubmit is used when an article needs major revisions but it is not clear yet whether those revisions will be able to be made as part of a first round review and … derrick harvey bellevue wa

Understanding the Publishing Process - PLOS

WebConcluding the First Reading After the initial read and using your notes, including those of any major flaws you found, draft the first two paragraphs of your review - the first summarizing the research question addressed and the second the contribution of the work. WebJan 8, 2014 · First, we would like to say thank you to the reviewers for the useful comments to improve the paper. We have addressed all the comments as explained below. REVIEWER 1. “Section 3 is too long”. We have addressed this comment by deleting a few lines at the end of the second paragraph that were not necessary for understanding the … WebApr 21, 2024 · Journal's first round review decision: "While the reviewers found the paper interesting, they all agreed that very extensive revisions will be necessary if the … derrick harvey obituary

IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking …

In the first round of review, we received the following decision. If we

WebReview guidelines. Ok, so you’ve agreed to review the paper. Thanks! Here’s a process and then a format that I recommend in this case. First of all, do the review ahead of schedule, as soon as you can, and before the arbitrary 6 week deadline. Second, you should determine in about 10 minutes whether the paper is a definite reject. WebFirst, you can contact a journal editor, introduce yourself and your area of expertise and ask that they consider you for any papers they receive that would fit with your content area. Second, most journal sites allow you to register as a … derrick hartley death chrysalis bespoke linen

"WebOct 16, 2014 · 3- The professional capacity, experience and knowledge of the reviewers. 4- The professionalism of the editor. 5- The publishing rules of the journal. 6- The experience, seriousness and knowledge... " - First round review by topic editor

First round review by topic editor

publications - Does the second round of reviewing …

WebAnswer (1 of 16): In my field, it is common for the first round of review to take about 3 months and an editor is not likely to take seriously a request to hurry the process before that. Everyone needs their papers published quickly — for graduate school applications, for job applications, for an... Web10 hours ago · The Collierville Design Review Commission met April 13. (Abigail Warren/The Daily Memphian) Walmart may be able to get away with the blue of its brand. Commissioners also reviewed a subdivision and one businesses who wants an alternative to awnings. Abigail Warren is a lifelong resident of Shelby ...

Did you know?

WebNov 8, 2015 · In my opinion, first round decides whether the quality and technicality of the paper is considerable or not. If yes, then reviewer provides his/her minor and major comments. In second round of review, first reviewer checks whether all his/her comments have been addressed or not. Is the paper now seems reason to accept? WebDec 28, 2015 · One can always object to the editor decision and the referee report. But this usually leads to nothing. The best is that when the author writes a report objecting the editor decision, he/she...

WebThe 30 Best Pieces of Advice for Entrepreneurs in 2024. The best company-building advice is timeless, with a focus on the fundamentals. We rounded up 30 essential insights for startups to lean on in the coming year, no matter the climate. As First Round’s Marketing Expert in Residence, Arielle Jackson often helps … FIRST ROUND ESSENTIALS Management. Given that a manager’s … When you sign up for a First Round Review membership, you’ll also unlock our fan … Get access to The Review’s Resource Center. Since 2013, we’ve published … In Depth — a new podcast from First Round Review. After publishing almost 500 … We believe that there is powerful, untapped knowledge out there that can transform … Unlock everything that The Review has to offer. We’ve given The Review a fresh … Sign in to The Review Sign up to get started immediately with all the Review has to … WebApr 7, 2024 · Tiger Woods tees off his second round at 12:54 p.m. ET alongside two players at the top of the leaderboard after Thursday's first round. Co-leader Viktor Hovland was tied with Jon Rahm and Brooks ...

WebFREE Add-Ons. – “High Impact English” Language Enhancement to highlight the core elements of your research (Value of $.045/word) – Three Multi-Round Edits (MRE) FREE within 6 months if required* (Value of $.028/word) – One FREE “Final Proof and Quality Check” of your corrections* (Value of $.022/word) WebFeb 17, 2024 · Modified 4 years, 1 month ago. Viewed 2k times. 5. I have a manuscript submitted in a journal, and there is a newly-added reviewer after the first round of …

WebApr 9, 2024 · Possible outcomes of peer review. The journal’s editor or editorial board considers the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and uses this information to …

WebAnswer: You alluded to the answer in your question. The First Round Blog is our place on the web to share information and announcements about First Round and our … chrysalis biotherapeuticsWebWhen a journal first receives your submission, there are typically two separate checks to confirm that the paper is appropriate and ready for peer review: Technical check. Performed by a technical editor to ensure that … derrick harvey washington countyWebThe review process should be timely and fair. Editors should assign reviewers immediately after receiving a new paper, and send personal emails to overdue reviewers (the … chrysalis biblical meaningWebApr 6, 2024 · Pending review = The paper is due to be pre-checked. Under review = The paper is being peer-reviewed. Pending decision = A first assessment will be made by … derrick hemingwayWebThe first round of peer review takes place after you’ve designed your study, but before you’ve collected or analyzed any data. This allows you to get feedback on both the question you’re looking to answer, and the … derrickheartsmichelle.minted.usWebFeb 17, 2024 · One of the jobs of an editor is to ensure that reviewers are sufficiently well qualified, objective, and thorough in their evaluation of a manuscript. Likewise, an editor-in-chief needs to ensure the handling editor is doing their job well as well. chrysalis bellingham spaWeb16. 7. 53. 87. Duration first review round is the time between submission of a manuscript and the moment the editor informs the author (s) about the outcome of the first peer review round. More information: Huisman & Smits, 2024. ‘Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective’, Scientometrics, 113 (1), pp. 633-650. derrick harvey smith state prison